Persecuting Behaviors

by Dr Rick | Mar 11, 2019 | Codependence

Check out:
Brief History of Codependence
How Do Normal Families Adjust To Addiction?
Rescuing Behaviors – First Responders
Suffering Behaviors – Are You A Martyr?

Persecuting Behaviors
Start When The Rescuer Gets Fed Up, Angry and Resentful

Persecuting behaviors comprise the group of behaviors typically experienced by those adjusting to a person with a problem. As noted, the surrounding family members first try to love the identified person into “good” behavior by rescuing or enabling them. It doesn’t work. The rescuer gets fed up, angry and resentful with the person with the problem, and then turns to persecuting behaviors.

The persecutor says things like “Why don’t you grow up! Why don’t you take some responsibility! Why do I have to do everything around here! Why don’t you appreciate what I am doing for you! This is unfair!“

Loved ones become angry because of the identified person’s harmful or embarrassing actions. By definition the identified person has a problem whether it be alcohol, viewing porn, anger, laziness,… etc. Therefore, there is always a “bad’ behavior to be irritated about.  A typical reaction to a loved-one’s bad behavior is resentment nagging, threatening, yelling, and blaming. 

The position of the persecutor is “It’s all identified person’s fault!” If that person would only stop using alcohol, viewing pornography, get a job, budget their money, or do or not do something – then everything would be okay! Furthermore the persecutor believes he/she can make that change happen if they can yell enough, talk enough, or threaten enough. Or in some cases it’s the “silent treatment” or “cold shoulder.” Either way the message is clear – “I hate this. I resent you. You better stop.”

The diagram below illustrates the common reaction to a person with a problem. One direction is the codependent isolating and experiencing “Suffering Behaviors.” We’ll talk about Suffering Behaviors later. The other common reaction is “Persecuting Behaviors.” Of course recognizing personal feelings and being assertive about those feelings is the healthy behavior.

PERSECUTING BEHAVIORS INCLUDE:
Religious activities decrease
Increased religious behaviors which the codpendent tried earlier as a rescuing behavior fail. Reality sets in because the identified person continues to exhibit the unwanted behavior e.g. viewing porn, alcohol regardless of how many prayers were said. The codependent feels that the prayer and other religious activities attempted as rescuing behaviors were unsuccessful. The codependent, out of despair, often turns away from God to his or her own personal power, returning to the previous level of religious activity because “God didn’t solve” the problem.

Threats
The codependent becomes desperate because all of the attempts to control or fix the addict seem to have failed. He or she may issue a variety of threats during this stage of codependence. These threats are usually extreme in nature. In the case of a spouse, divorce or separation are suggested. Often in the religious family, threats take the form of laying guilt or shame or the addict in and attempt to force the addict into a sobriety. Such threats are unsuccessful because of their extreme nature and the fact that they are seldom implemented. Most common threats include: “Next time I’m divorcing / leaving!” I heard a teen alcoholic explain this best description of a threat, “All my parents do is bark, they never bite.” 

Nagging behaviors
The persecutor says the same thing over and over again thinking they surely could say the right thing that would eventually change the identified person’s behavior.  They subtly insert rude manipulative comments. Perhaps believing they could hurt or shame the identified person enough that of course they would stop the unwanted behavior and start the wanted behavior. At times, the nagging behaviors can be non-verbal like facial expressions, sighs, or simply not talking-cold shoulder treatment.

Irrational Behaviors
As the addiction/ or problem progresses, codependents become increasingly desperate and reach a pint where they will try almost anything to control the addiction problem. One active member of a church placed honey in her husband’s bedding when he continually came home with pornographic magazines. Other common irrational behavior is hiding the laptop, dumping out the alcohol, etc.

Identified person’s response
Well what does the identified person do with the unwanted behavior, They typically  continue the unwanted behavior – porn, alcohol etc after being the recipient of the persecuting behaviors feels he deserves it, look, after all, he says to himself, at what I’ve been putting up with.

Here is the Facebook Live video on Persecuting Behaviors.

Follow me on

(C) Docyoucan 2019

Rescuing Behaviors- First Responders

by Dr Rick | Mar 4, 2019 | Codependence

Check out:
Brief History of Codependence
How Do Normal Families Adjust To Addiction?
Persecuting Behaviors
Suffering Behaviors – Are You A Martyr?

 FIRST RESPONDERS COME TO THE RESCUE
– IN THE NAME OF LOVE

Generally, it is impossible for those with addictions or other problem behavior to maintain their dysfunctional behavior in isolation. They need a supporting system of codependence.

An addict or person with a problem needs you!

The dysfunctional behaviors developed by surrounding loved ones in an  effort to help a person with a problem behavior are referred to as “Codependence.” I refer to these codependent behaviors as Rescuing Behaviors, Persecuting Behaviors, and Suffering Behaviors.  It has been my experience.the primary goal of codependence is to help the identified person and to show love. Certainly, there is no great sin in trying to help or to love another person!

Unfortunately codependent behaviors are generally ineffective in changing another person’s behavior. Rescuing Behaviors, Persecuting Behaviors, and Suffering Behaviors tend to support and to maintain the problem behavior. I use the term “identified person” to represent the loved-one with a problem behavior. The problem behavior may be an addiction, mental illness, physical handicap, anger, self-harm, etc.

© Tom Grill/Corbis

In our Christian society, many believe that if a person is in need, we are responsible to help.  Behind every irresponsible addict – or identified person – is often a hyper-responsible person. Rescuing behaviors are often the initial response of “first responders”. First responders are among the first to arrive and provide assistance at the scene of an emergency, such as an accident and natural disaster. Their job: identify the problem and provide immediate help. If there is a fire, put it out!

These rescuing behaviors often protect the identified person from immediate consequences of their own irresponsible behavior and prevent growth from occuring. 

The damage caused by Rescuing Behaviors include:

1. When done in excess the Rescuer becomes worn out, exhausted, etc.  Saying, “We can do this.” Really meaning “I’ll do this for you.”
2. The identified person with a problem behavior becomes weaker – because someone is doing for them what they could have done for themselves. Saying, “Here let me do this for you.” 
3. The Rescuer reinforces the identified person’s inability to scuceed. Saying, “You really need my help. You can’t do this.” 

Here are examples of a few Rescuing Behaviors. 

Denying
Denial is a common behavior developed by surrounding loved ones of an identified person. Several assumptions follow the admission that a member of the family has a problem. One assumption is the false belief, “If there is a problem with them then there must be a problem with me.” In essence, a codpendent assumes they have failed because their loved-one has a problem. If it is your child, then you have failed as a parent. If it is your spouse, then you have failed as a partner. If it is your parent, then you have failed as a child. Much pain, guilt, and confusion come with accepting the truth that a loved one has a problem behavior like addiction. 

The intensity of denial seems greater with those who are sincerely involved in their religion. Often, the more active a person is in religion, the more difficult it will be for them to determine healthy boundaries for helping. A Christian codependent mistakenly equates “Rescuing Behaviors” with “Christ-like love.” Religious persons tend to be so fearful that an addiction or some other problem may be occurring in their family that they deny and overlook the clear signs of it. An analogy that helps explain the concept of denial is that of a child who recently went swimming. If that child were standing dripping wet by the swimming pool, wearing a swimming suit, we would not likely ask questions like “Where have you been? What have you been doing?” Codependents, often confront an identified person in a similar fashion – although clearly observing evidence of a problem behavior whether it be anger, viewing porn, alcohol, etc, a codependent may ask something like “What’s going on?” The most classic case of denial is the codependent acting like nothing is wrong- not talking about “the elephant in the front room.” 

Substance abuse example
Perhaps the Golden Question most commonly asked by religious codependents when alcohol, drugs or paraphernalia are found is, ‘Whose is this?” The substance abuser’s Golden Answer is, “I’m holding it for a friend.” We want to believe their responses so we continue to rescue them from the consequences of their behavior by denying the obvious and accepting their lies. Often it takes the equivalent of a Grand Jury conviction for a religious family to admit that a loved one has a problem.

Increased Religious Activities
Religious activities often increase during the first stage of codependency. The codependent firmly believes that fasting, prayer, and careful obedience to each of God’s commandments will cure the addict – identified person. After discovering a family member is using drugs, or pornography, etc loved ones often commit to reading the scriptures, going to church, and having saying more prayers than ever before. The underlying goals for such behavior appears to be “Get God to Fix Him.” The increased religioius activities isn’t the problem. The problem is their purpose is a temporary fix and not a change of heart.

Covering Up
Covering up is a specific behavior that codependents exhibit to clean up or make things better after the identified person has been irresponsible. For example, a wife might call her spouse’s work to report him “ill” with the flu when , in reality he was in bed with a hangover. In an effort to save their child from a police record and experiences in lock-up parents of an identified person will run to the police station to rescue their child. A codependent will clean up the broken glass or hide the empty beer cans to make sure no one finds out. At times a codependent will even miss important church meetings in order to perform the necessary cover-up behaviors.

A codependent often becomes so effective in covering up the consequences of the identified person that even the identified person might very truthfully say “There’s no problem.” In other words, even the identified person does not realize the seriousness of the problems that he or she might be causing because the codependent has done such thorough job in covering up. 

Lying
Rescuing behaviors become so intense that codepndents will begin to tell “white lies.” For example, when church leaders, friends and family members ask “How are things going?“, the rescuer responds with “It’s not bad,” or “I’m fine,” or “It’s okay,”   The lying process is called “minimization,” and it is a rescuing behavior. The lies are typically unintentional and often unnoticed. A codependent lies to children, to neighbors, to church leaders, and most commonly to self.

Summary:
In summary, typically the identified person – the person with the problem e.g. alcohol use, viewing pornography, anger etc. already believe they can’t change. When you exhibit rescuing / enabling behaviors you’re demonstrating the same- You don’t believe they can change either. 😢 

Here is my Facebook Live video on this topic:

The Doc #docyoucan #codependence

A Brief History of Codependence

by Dr Rick | Feb 25, 2019 | Codependence

Check out:
How Do Normal Families Adjust To Addiction?
Rescuing Behaviors – First Responders
Persecuting Behaviors
Suffering Behaviors – Are You A Martyr?

A normal healthy family (and even families that aren’t healthy) can adjust to a family member’s “problem behavior” by developing “codependence.” A family member’s “problem behavior” may include such behaviors as: pornography addiction, substance abuse, mental illness, health problems, disabilities, etc. etc. “Codependence” is the name of the dysfunctional behaviors that surrounding family members develop as they adapt to the family member who has the “problem behavior.”

The dysfunctional adaptive behaviors that surrounding family members develop are similar across different circumstances. For example, codependent behavior exhibited by a wife adjusting to a husband’s porn problem would be similar to a dad adjusting to a daughter’s mental illness. In my experience the core components of codependence are:

1) A family member with a problem behavior- some form of addiction, inability, or disability. This behavior can be intentional e.g. alcohol use or a consequence of nature e.g. down’s syndrome. The key ingredient is a family member with a problem and perceived as needing help.
2) A family member (or members) adapting to the person with the problem using a series of dysfunctional coping skills. These dysfunctional codependent behaviors are easily identified and have a pattern.   

Of course not all families adjust to another’s problem with codependence, many families adjust in healthy ways.

There are numerous explanations of these patterns of codependence. Here are just a few.

Codependence and 12-Step Groups
Codependence has its’ origin with Al-Anon 12-step family support groups. Al-Anon members are people, who are worried about someone with a drinking problem. Many who go to Al-Anon/Alateen are in despair, feeling hopeless, unable to believe that things can ever change. Al-Anon members want their lives to be different, because they have developed dysfunctioinal coping behavors as they have lived with an “alcoholic.”  These codpendent coping behavors have failed to bring about change.  Al-Anon teaches its members new coping behaviors whether the alcoholic is still drinking or not.  Al-Anon was one of the first organization to promote the concept of “Family Illness.”

Alcoholism is a family disease. The disease affects all those who have a relationship with a problem drinker. Those of us closest to the alcoholic suffer the most, and those who care the most can easily get caught up in the behavior of another person. We react to the alcoholic’s behavior. We focus on them, what they do, where they are, how much they drink. We try to control their drinking for them. We take on the blame, guilt, and shame that really belong to the drinker. We can become as addicted to the alcoholic, as the alcoholic is to alcohol. We, too, can become ill. (Al-Anon).

In fact now we have CODA, CoDependants Anonymous. CODA is a 12-step support group focusing specifically on “Codependence.”  CODA has its’ list of Patterns and Characteristics of Codependence. CODA identifies codependent behaviors like: Avoidance Patterns, Control Patterns, Compliance Patterns, Low Self-Esteem Patterns, and Denial Patterns.

Melody Beattie
Melody Beattie, in her book Codependent No More: How to Stop Controlling Others and Start Caring for Yourself, defines a codependent as:

“…One who has let another person’s behavior affect him or her, and who is obsessed with controlling that person’s behavior. The other person might be a child, an adult, a lover, a spouse, a brother, a sister, a grandparent, a parent, a client, or a best friend. He or she could be an alcoholic, a drug addict, a mentally or physically ill person, a normal person who occasionally has sad feelings, or one of the people mentioned earlier.”

The specific signs of codependency can often look different depending on the person experiencing it.

Karpman Drama Triangle
The Karpman Drama Triangle  is a social model of human interaction – the triangle maps a type of destructive interaction – codependence, that can occur between people in conflict. The drama triangle model is a tool used in psychotherapy, specifically transactional analysis, and often in 12-step support groups. Here is a brief description of the three “codependent” roles involved in the triangle:

The Victim: (Victim) The Victim’s stance is “Poor me!” The Victim feels victimized, oppressed, helpless, hopeless, powerless, ashamed, and seems unable to make decisions, solve problems, take pleasure in life, or achieve insight.  

The Rescuer: (Hero) The rescuer’s line is “Let me help you.” A classic enabler, the Rescuer feels guilty if they don’t go to the rescue. Yet their rescuing has negative effects: It keeps the Victim dependent and gives the Victim permission to fail. The rewards derived from this rescue role are that the focus is taken off of the rescuer. When they focus their energy on someone else, it enables them to ignore their own anxiety and issues.  

The Persecutor: (Villain) The Persecutor insists, “It’s all your fault.” The Persecutor is controlling, blaming, critical, oppressive, angry, authoritative, rigid, and superior.

Although tthe names have changed, but the concepts remain the same. Here is a brief video An Introduction to the Drama Triangle. This 3 minute video uses the labels Villain, Hero, and Victim to explain the copdependent roles involved in the Drama Triangle.

Over the years, everyone seems to have come on board with their own perspective of codependence. Here’s Oprah’s take. For example check-out her article How to Stop Being a Martyr. 

Here is my Facebook Live video on this topic:

Next go to Rescuing Behaviors- First Responders